2/ Angry:
If #Biden stays in the race — as it appears he will — he can, and will beat Donald #Trump again with our help.
If Biden decides to leave the race, Kamala Harris can, and will beat Donald Trump with our help.
The situation is politically complicated, but it’s also fundamentally very easy. Our job doesn’t change. Our goals don’t change.
We’re going to follow the UK. We’re going to follow France.
We’re going to defeat authoritarianism.
I swear I was just going to post nearly exactly this, but Angry Staffer said it better: 1/2
I think everyone needs to take a step back, breathe, think about the reality we’re in
We’re all on same side here. We all have the same goal. Yes, we may have different ideas for how to get there, but we all want the same thing.
Trumpism has to be defeated; #Project2025 can’t be allowed anywhere near the corridors of power.
We have to stop fighting amongst ourselves and keep our eyes on the prize
Reposting so the whole thread (i first replied to) isn't hijacked by my gardening rants...
The guy at the gardening shop told me why my peppers were weird looking, not the same as the ones I took the seeds from, no taste. "Oh, those are gmos, you have to buy the packets, you can't plant what you eat."
Huge dystopia hit me. I saw a desert planet.
Centuries of #indigenous selective food breeding, making juicy corn from tiny plants, all that selection for taste and size, wiped out in one fell swoop.
The problems have been warped by calling them #GMO conspiracies about DNA. So anyone against it sounds realllly stupid. "They’re putting aborted babies in our food!"
But the real problem is the seedcorn and sterility. Non-sustainable to poor farmers who can't afford the fancy new seeds every year.
Better, healthier "golden rice" is great. But making it sterile was a choice. #PlannedObsolecence is what you get when computer guys like Bill Gates go into the food market.
Just the thought of sterilised seeds instils horror in me when I think about the natural, gradual hybridization of this shit, leading to a sterile earth. #greenthumb #food
Photo of my second gen "tomatoes." Zulu coconut for size reference
Sterile isn't the right word. Because they CAN cross pollinate.
Hi, I wrote a normal number of words talking about what it was like to build my new website from scratch with Eleventy.
Expect #accelerationism to be super fashionable in the next 4 months.
Accelerationhism is easy, lazy, & I'm not aware of a case where it's ever helped.
from Cory Doctorow @pluralistic
Americans are living through a multigenerational project of stamping out solidarity and insisting that we only ever view ourselves as individuals, with no stake in the plights of our neighbors. That's how the US got the most expensive, least effective health care system in the world. And even if you are in the vanishingly tiny minority of Americans who are happy with their health care, you live amongst people who are being killed by the system around you.
The health system is a perfect example of how monopolization drives more monopolization, and how that comes to harm the public and workers. Health consolidation began with pharma mergers, that led to pharma companies gouging hospitals. Hospitals, in turn, engaged in a nonstop orgy of mergers, which created regional monopolies that could resist the pricing power of monopoly pharma – and screw insurers. That kicked off consolidation in insurance, which is why most Americans have a "choice" of between one and three private insurers – and why health workers' monopoly employers have eroded their wages and working conditions.
A new study in American Economic Review: Insights puts some quantitative spine in this tale, tracking the relationship between hospital mergers and skyrocketed health-care prices:
https://harris.uchicago.edu/news-events/news/consolidation-hospital-sector-leading-higher-health-care-costs-study-finds?itid=lk_inline_enhanced-template
The researchers investigated 1,164 acute-care hospital mergers, finding that while the FTC only challenged 1% of these, they could – and should – have challenged 20% of them, based on the agency's own criteria for merger scrutiny. The researchers blame the rising costs of hospital care directly on these mergers, and point out that Congress has historically starved the FTC of the budget it needed to investigate these mergers. The annual additional costs to the American people from these mergers exceed the entire annual budget of the FTC.
It's not just hospitals: the entire investor class is hell-bent on spending their way to monopoly. Nowhere is that more true than in AI, where hundreds of billions are being poured into bids to attain permanent dominance through scale. Writing for their excellent AI Snake Oil newsletter, Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor inject some realism into the AI scale hype:
https://www.aisnakeoil.com/p/ai-scaling-myths
Narayanan and Kapoor challenge the idea that throwing more data at large language models will make the better: "With LLMs, we may have a couple of orders of magnitude of scaling left, or we may already be done." They are skeptical that this can be fixed with synthetic data (whose use is limited to "fixing specific gaps and making domain-specific improvements"). They also point out that if returns from data slow, then adding more compute or making bigger models might also be throttled.
They reserve their most skeptical take for "AGI" – the idea that LLMs are going to achieve consciousness. This is a fundamentally unserious idea, one that they unpack in detail in their forthcoming book:
https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691249131/ai-snake-oil
One thing I'm hoping for from the book is some analysis of the material usefulness of AI hype – what purpose does the hype serve? I mean, obviously, hype is useful if you're looking to suck up investor capital, or flip an investment to a greater fool. But there's a specific character to AI hype: namely, the claim that AI will displace labor, which is really a claim that a bet on AI is a bet on the increasing wealth of capital at labor's expense.
In other words, AI is a bet on oligarchy. In America, that's a pretty safe bet, and the odds just got even better, thanks to a string of brutal Supreme Court decisions that legalized bribery, banned most regulatory enforcement, and made being alive and unhoused into a crime (Poor Laws 2.0):
https://prospect.org/justice/2024-06-29-whos-gonna-check-supreme-court-chevron-separation-powers/
via https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic/112701045795458082
IIRC slavery, with respect to prisons, is still allowed in the U.S. And now the #SCOTUS has declared it's ok to jail the homeless. Oh btw private prisons exist in the U.S. as well. Prisons with shareholders. Hmmm.
I worked for the burningman project as Department of Public Works for 16 or so years. I have been programming since I was 12 and this is my 1st forray into social media. Here's hoping federation lives up to its promises!